Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon A1000
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
86 Imaging
43 Features
64 Overall
51
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon A1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 330g - 114 x 72 x 41mm
- Released January 2019
- Succeeded the Nikon A900
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon A1000 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon A1000, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Kodak and Nikon. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and A1000 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuitThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 6 years earlier than the A1000 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon A1000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores against the A1000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon A1000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon Coolpix A1000. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Nikon A1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Nikon A1000
Astro Zoom AZ651 | A1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Reasons to pick Nikon A1000 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
A1000 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | January 2014 | Newer by 61 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon A1000
Astro Zoom AZ651 | A1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon A1000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features physical dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Nikon A1000 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon A1000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the A1000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and A1000 is 65 and 86 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon A1000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The image below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and A1000.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to resolve greater detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon A1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon A1000 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Nikon Coolpix A1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Nikon |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Nikon Coolpix A1000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2019-01-18 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.4-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 98 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (with Auto ISO) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | No |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 330 gr (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 114 x 72 x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | - | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $419 | $477 |