Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300

Portability
65
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S9300 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Announced January 2014
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched July 2012
  • Superseded the Nikon S9100
  • Refreshed by Nikon S9500
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Kodak and Nikon. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and S9300 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled 18 months after the S9300 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades against the S9300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Nikon S9300

 Astro Zoom AZ651 S9300 
LaunchedJanuary 2014July 2012Newer by 18 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 S9300 Astro Zoom AZ651 
Screen resolution921k920kSharper screen (+1k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon S9300

 Astro Zoom AZ651 S9300 
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys outside dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Nikon S9300 has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).

Check the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the S9300.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and S9300 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The picture here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and S9300.

All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 5MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Astro Zoom AZ651 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography factors
Nikon S9300 Portrait photography factors
53
has manual focus
decent megapixels (21MP)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
34
good resolution (16MP)
features face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography advice
Nikon S9300 Street photography advice
58
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (567g)
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (215g)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Sports photography camera
Nikon S9300 as a Sports photography camera
50
long zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (21 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
47
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (200 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography details
Nikon S9300 Travel photography details
59
decent megapixels (21MP)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (1560mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (567 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
66
lighter than average in class (215g)
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery life (200 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography info
Nikon S9300 Landscape photography info
54
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (21 megapixels)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
41
quite wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
terrible battery life (200 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Vlogging with Nikon S9300
59
rather wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (567g)
34
quite wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (215g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon S9300
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Nikon Coolpix S9300
General Information
Make Kodak Nikon
Model type Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Nikon Coolpix S9300
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2014-01-07 2012-07-16
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 21 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 25-450mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range 3cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Continuous shutter rate 9.0 frames/s 6.9 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 567 gr (1.25 lb) 215 gr (0.47 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 pictures
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - EN-EL12
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $419 $249