Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9500
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


92 Imaging
42 Features
37 Overall
40
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Previous Model is Nikon S9300
- Later Model is Nikon S9700

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9500 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon S9500, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the S9500 (18MP) is relatively similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was announced 12 months after the S9500 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9500 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades vs the S9500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Nikon Coolpix S9500. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Nikon S9500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Nikon S9500
Astro Zoom AZ651 | S9500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 12 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
S9500 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon S9500
Astro Zoom AZ651 | S9500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Nikon S9500 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon S9500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the S9500.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and S9500 is 65 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The picture below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and S9500.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to offer more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9500 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Nikon |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Nikon Coolpix S9500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-01-07 | 2013-01-29 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 25-550mm (22.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | 7.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | EN-EL12 |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $419 | $230 |