Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon D3300
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


69 Imaging
65 Features
72 Overall
67
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon D3300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 430g - 124 x 98 x 76mm
- Launched April 2014
- Succeeded the Nikon D3200
- Newer Model is Nikon D3400

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon D3300 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon D3300, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the D3300 (24MP) is very comparable but the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and D3300 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled 3 months prior to the D3300 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon D3300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades against the D3300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon D3300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Nikon D3300. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Nikon D3300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Nikon D3300
Astro Zoom AZ651 | D3300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon D3300 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
D3300 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon D3300
Astro Zoom AZ651 | D3300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | April 2014 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon D3300 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 offers outside measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Nikon D3300 has dimensions of 124mm x 98mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 430 grams (0.95 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon D3300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the D3300.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and D3300 is 65 and 69 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon D3300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and D3300.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Astro Zoom AZ651 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Nikon D3300 will produce more detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon D3300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon D3300 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Nikon D3300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Nikon |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Nikon D3300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2014-04-21 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed 4 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Nikon F |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 309 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (160 degree viewing angle) |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p fps), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) | 430 gr (0.95 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 124 x 98 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1385 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 700 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | EN-EL14a |
Self timer | - | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $419 | $500 |