Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500

Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Olympus E-500 front
Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Launched January 2014
Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Photography Glossary

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and E-500 (8MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and E-500 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was manufactured 8 years later than the E-500 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores vs the E-500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus E-500

 Astro Zoom AZ651 E-500 
LaunchedJanuary 2014October 2005More recent by 100 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kCrisper screen (+705k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 E-500 Astro Zoom AZ651 

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus E-500

 Astro Zoom AZ651 E-500 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Touch screen No Touch screen

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 offers outside measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-500 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).

Examine the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the E-500.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and E-500 is 65 and 70 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The visual here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and E-500.

As you can tell, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Astro Zoom AZ651 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will provide more detail due to its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 will have an edge in sensor technology.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
53
manual focus
good MP (21MP)
offers face detect focusing
exports RAW files
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
48
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-500 Street photography highlights
59
screen articulates
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than others in class (567g)
56
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (479g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
51
incredible zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (21MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-500 Travel photography advice
60
good MP (21 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (1560mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (567g)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
52
lighter than competitors in class (479 grams)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
54
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (21MP)
exports RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse function
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-500 Vlogging highlights
60
fairly wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (567g)
9
no video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus E-500
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Olympus E-500
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Olympus E-500
Otherwise known as - EVOLT E-500
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Launched 2014-01-07 2005-10-21
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 21 megapixels 8 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 3264 x 2448
Maximum native ISO 3200 400
Maximum boosted ISO - 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 25 3
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 24-1560mm (65.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Available lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 215 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 100% 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.45x
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 9.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings - Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 567 grams (1.25 pounds) 479 grams (1.06 pounds)
Physical dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage - Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $419 $600