Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50

Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Olympus SH-50 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview

Here is a extended overview of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus SH-50, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and SH-50 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was revealed 13 months later than the SH-50 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up vs the SH-50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus SH-50

 Astro Zoom AZ651 SH-50 
ReleasedJanuary 2014January 2013Fresher by 13 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 SH-50 Astro Zoom AZ651 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus SH-50

 Astro Zoom AZ651 SH-50 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features external dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has proportions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus SH-50 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the SH-50.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and SH-50 is 65 and 88 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and SH-50.

Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger Astro Zoom AZ651 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SH-50 as a Portrait photography camera
54
manual focus
megapixel count decent (21 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
44
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography highlights
Olympus SH-50 Street photography highlights
59
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors in class (567 grams)
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
lighter than competitors (269g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SH-50 as a Sports photography camera
51
incredible zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (21 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
48
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Travel photography with Olympus SH-50
60
megapixel count decent (21MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (1560mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (567 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
69
lighter than competitors (269g)
supports touch focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus SH-50 Landscape photography highlights
54
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (21MP)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
49
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging details
Olympus SH-50 Vlogging details
60
pretty wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (567 grams)
34
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (269g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
missing mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus SH-50
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Olympus SH-50
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Olympus SH-50
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-01-07 2013-01-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 21MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 15 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 9.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 567 gr (1.25 lb) 269 gr (0.59 lb)
Dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-10A
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $419 $300