Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was launched 24 months later than the TG-820 iHS which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
Astro Zoom AZ651 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
TG-820 iHS | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+110k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
Astro Zoom AZ651 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides outside dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 compared to the TG-820 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and TG-820 iHS is 65 and 92 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 1,030k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $419 | $500 |