Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-5
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2017
- Older Model is Olympus TG-4
- Successor is Olympus TG-6

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus TG-5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and TG-5 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the TG-5 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up vs the TG-5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus TG-5
Astro Zoom AZ651 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
TG-5 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 40 months |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus TG-5
Astro Zoom AZ651 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has outside measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus TG-5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the TG-5.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and TG-5 is 65 and 90 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and TG-5.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to produce more detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older Astro Zoom AZ651 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2017-05-17 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 250 gr (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $419 | $449 |