Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Updated by Panasonic FZ300
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Kodak and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled 18 months after the FZ200 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores vs the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Panasonic FZ200
Astro Zoom AZ651 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | July 2012 | More modern by 18 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
FZ200 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FZ200
Astro Zoom AZ651 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features outside dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the FZ200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FZ200 is 65 and 65 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FZ200.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to deliver extra detail having an extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Astro Zoom AZ651 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) | 588 gr (1.30 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 540 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $419 | $499 |