Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ2500
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is fairly similar but the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") come with totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was released 3 years earlier than the FZ2500 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores vs the FZ2500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Panasonic FZ2500
Astro Zoom AZ651 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
FZ2500 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2014 | More recent by 32 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FZ2500
Astro Zoom AZ651 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides outside dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has proportions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the FZ2500.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FZ2500 is 65 and 53 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FZ2500.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Astro Zoom AZ651 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-01-07 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lb) | 915 grams (2.02 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $419 | $998 |