Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS35
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and ZS35 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was manufactured at a similar time to the ZS35 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades against the ZS35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Panasonic ZS35
Astro Zoom AZ651 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
ZS35 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic ZS35
Astro Zoom AZ651 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | January 2014 | Same generation | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides outside measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Panasonic ZS35 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the ZS35.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and ZS35 is 65 and 89 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The graphic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and ZS35.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to render more detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 pounds) | 305 grams (0.67 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $419 | $300 |