Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 3 years after the CX3 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up versus the CX3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Ricoh CX3
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 44 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| CX3 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh CX3
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Identical display resolution |
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys outer dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the CX3.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and CX3 is 65 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and CX3.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to offer you greater detail using its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images much more aggressively. The younger Astro Zoom AZ651 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 206 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $419 | $329 |