Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/077c8/077c8d0ffde6e06784e3efdfa010c6cd7eb8c7da" alt="Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e742/4e74284e98f8a2f698e6b96487e93d8958a78f02" alt="Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The Astro Zoom AZ651 was released 3 years later than the CX4 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades against the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Ricoh CX4
Astro Zoom AZ651 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 42 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
CX4 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh CX4
Astro Zoom AZ651 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | The same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides exterior measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the CX4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04427/0442708285350fc5ef46a7d05970690b3670e68d" alt="Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and CX4 is 65 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/737fc/737fcf31294468d9590f9c06356be7aa0ebf28de" alt="Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The visual below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and CX4.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger Astro Zoom AZ651 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06a9c/06a9cf352eaff8e53f45ab4e1506f8385601d52f" alt="Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison"
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26815/2681500245ca4ddf7331ecf348c768fb6974023f" alt="Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh CX4 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2010-08-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $419 | $211 |