Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GR III
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh GR III
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR III

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Ricoh GR III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the GR III (24MP) is relatively similar but the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was revealed 5 years earlier than the GR III and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the GR III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Ricoh GR III. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Ricoh GR III
Astro Zoom AZ651 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
GR III | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 57 months |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh GR III
Astro Zoom AZ651 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides physical measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the GR III.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and GR III is 65 and 90 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading specifications. The photograph here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and GR III.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Astro Zoom AZ651 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR III will offer you more detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh GR III |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2018-09-25 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 257 gr (0.57 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $419 | $900 |