Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-70
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 7 years prior to the WG-70 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up versus the WG-70 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Ricoh WG-70
Astro Zoom AZ651 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
WG-70 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 73 months |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh WG-70
Astro Zoom AZ651 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides physical dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the WG-70.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WG-70 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The pic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WG-70.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to offer you greater detail using its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2020-02-04 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | On, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $419 | $280 |