Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80

Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Ricoh WG-80 front
Portability
91
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Released January 2014
Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.70" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2022
  • Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was brought out 9 years before the WG-80 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-80 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores against the WG-80 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

				

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Ricoh WG-80

 Astro Zoom AZ651 WG-80 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.70"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 WG-80 Astro Zoom AZ651 
IntroducedMay 2022January 2014Fresher by 101 months

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh WG-80

 Astro Zoom AZ651 WG-80 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Touch display No Touch display

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys outer measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Compare the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh WG-80 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the WG-80.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WG-80 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WG-80.

To sum up, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to render greater detail having its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The older Astro Zoom AZ651 will be behind in sensor technology.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-80 as a Portrait photography camera
53
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (21MP)
features face detect focus
exports RAW formats
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
43
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-80 Street photography highlights
59
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors in class (567g)
55
environment proof
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-80
51
long zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (21MP)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
43
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-80 Travel photography details
60
decent sensor resolution (21MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
really wide (24mm)
great reach (1560mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (567g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
71
environment proof
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-80 Landscape photography highlights
54
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (21 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
44
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
good resolution (16MP)
environment proof
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.70 inches)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging info
Ricoh WG-80 Vlogging info
60
really wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (567 grams)
31
decently wide (28mm)
includes face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
does not have external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh WG-80
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Ricoh WG-80
General Information
Company Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Ricoh WG-80
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2014-01-07 2022-05-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 21MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.70 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 9.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options - On, off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 567 grams (1.25 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $419 $300