Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Kodak and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizing.

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled 13 months later than the EX2F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the EX2F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung EX2F
Astro Zoom AZ651 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | December 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
EX2F | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung EX2F
Astro Zoom AZ651 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features external dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the EX2F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and EX2F is 65 and 90 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The visual underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and EX2F.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Astro Zoom AZ651 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will provide more detail having an extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $419 | $478 |