Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F

Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Samsung EX2F front
Portability
90
Imaging
37
Features
62
Overall
47

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Launched January 2014
Samsung EX2F
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
  • 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
  • Announced December 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Overview

Here is a comprehensive overview of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Kodak and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled 13 months later than the EX2F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the EX2F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung EX2F

 Astro Zoom AZ651 EX2F 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014December 2012Fresher by 13 months
Display resolution920k0kCrisper display (+920k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 EX2F Astro Zoom AZ651 

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung EX2F

 Astro Zoom AZ651 EX2F 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Both good for selfies
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features external dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the EX2F.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and EX2F is 65 and 90 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The visual underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and EX2F.

To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Astro Zoom AZ651 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will provide more detail having an extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung EX2F as a Portrait photography camera
53
has manual focus
decent MP (21MP)
provides face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
42
manual focus
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Street photography with Samsung EX2F
59
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (567 grams)
68
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than average (294 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sports photography highlights
Samsung EX2F Sports photography highlights
51
great zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (21MP)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
31
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Travel photography with Samsung EX2F
60
decent MP (21MP)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (1560mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (567g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
66
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
pretty wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f1.4)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (294g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography factors
Samsung EX2F Landscape photography factors
54
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (21 megapixels)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse mode
53
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f1.4)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging highlights
Samsung EX2F Vlogging highlights
60
reasonably wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
lack of microphone support
more heavy than competition (567g)
71
pretty wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f1.4)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
no mic support
heavier than average (294g)
Photography Glossary

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung EX2F
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Samsung EX2F
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Samsung EX2F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2014-01-07 2012-12-18
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 21MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 24-80mm (3.3x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/1.4-2.7
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dots 0k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - AMOLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s -
Continuous shooting rate 9.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 567 grams (1.25 pounds) 294 grams (0.65 pounds)
Dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 48
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 209
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $419 $478