Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally referred to as EX1

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizes.

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was manufactured 3 years after the TL500 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades versus the TL500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Samsung TL500. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung TL500
Astro Zoom AZ651 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
TL500 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung TL500
Astro Zoom AZ651 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has outer measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the TL500.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and TL500 is 65 and 88 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and TL500.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Astro Zoom AZ651 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will result in extra detail due to its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Samsung |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung TL500 |
Otherwise known as | - | EX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-01-07 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-07A |
Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $419 | $527 |