Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB35F
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled very close to the WB35F so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up against the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung WB35F
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| WB35F | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB35F
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | January 2014 | Same age | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides physical measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the WB35F.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB35F is 65 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The image here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB35F.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP70A |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $419 | $130 |