Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9

Portability
65
Imaging
44
Features
56
Overall
48
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Sigma SD9 front
Portability
54
Imaging
38
Features
27
Overall
33

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Launched November 2002
  • Replacement is Sigma SD10
Photography Glossary

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Kodak and Sigma. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was released 11 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades versus the SD9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Sigma SD9

 Astro Zoom AZ651 SD9 
LaunchedJanuary 2014November 2002More recent by 136 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution920k130kCrisper display (+790k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 SD9 Astro Zoom AZ651 

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sigma SD9

 Astro Zoom AZ651 SD9 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has outer dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Compare the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 compared to the SD9.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and SD9 is 65 and 54 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and SD9.

As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Astro Zoom AZ651 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 18MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography features
Sigma SD9 Portrait photography features
53
manual focus
resolution is good (21MP)
features face detection focus
supports RAW files
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
46
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (3MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Street photography with Sigma SD9
58
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (567g)
43
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
no image stabilization
heavier than competition (950g)
maximum ISO low (400)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sports photography factors
Sigma SD9 Sports photography factors
50
great zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (21 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
35
max shutter speed is good (1/6,000 seconds)
good sensor size (APS-C)
no liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (3MP)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Travel photography camera
59
resolution is good (21 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (1560mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (567g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
29
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (950 grams)
megapixel count low (3 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Landscape photography camera
54
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (21MP)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse recording
40
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (1.8")
no liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (3MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging highlights
Sigma SD9 Vlogging highlights
59
decently wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition (567 grams)
9
no video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sigma SD9
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Sigma SD9
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sigma
Model type Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Sigma SD9
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2014-01-07 2002-11-26
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 21 megapixel 3 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 2268 x 1512
Maximum native ISO 3200 400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 24-1560mm (65.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Available lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 1.8"
Screen resolution 920k dot 130k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 98 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Lowest shutter speed - 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/6000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 9.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 567 gr (1.25 lb) 950 gr (2.09 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer - Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media - Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $419 $3,001