Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony NEX-5N
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49


89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Announced October 2011
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5
- Later Model is Sony NEX-5R

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony NEX-5N Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Sony NEX-5N, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Kodak and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and NEX-5N (16MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and NEX-5N (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was revealed 2 years after the NEX-5N which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores vs the NEX-5N when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony NEX-5N Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Sony Alpha NEX-5N. The full galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Sony NEX-5N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Sony NEX-5N
Astro Zoom AZ651 | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | October 2011 | More modern by 28 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
NEX-5N | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sony NEX-5N
Astro Zoom AZ651 | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same screen resolution |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has exterior dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5N has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Sony NEX-5N in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the NEX-5N.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and NEX-5N is 65 and 89 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and NEX-5N.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Astro Zoom AZ651 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will give extra detail because of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Sony |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2011-10-03 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1079 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 460 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $419 | $550 |