Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX400V
Portability
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Announced February 2014
- Older Model is Sony HX300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX400V Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sony HX400V, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Sony. The image resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the HX400V (20MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was revealed very close to the HX400V so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores vs the HX400V for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Sony HX400V
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| HX400V | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sony HX400V
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | February 2014 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has got exterior dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Sony HX400V has dimensions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Sony HX400V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the HX400V.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and HX400V is 65 and 62 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and HX400V.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to offer greater detail because of its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony HX400V as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
resolution is good (21 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
includes face detect focusing
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography details
Sony HX400V Street photography details
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
small sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (567g)
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than average (660g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Sports photography with Sony HX400V
incredible zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (21 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
includes tracking focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography factors
Sony HX400V Travel photography factors
resolution is good (21 megapixels)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1560mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (567 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (660 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography highlights
Sony HX400V Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (21 megapixels)
supports RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse function
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Vlogging with Sony HX400V
relatively wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition (567g)
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have mic socket
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
heavier than average (660 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Sony |
| Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | - | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567g (1.25 lb) | 660g (1.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $419 | $448 |
