Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220
88 Imaging
53 Features
61 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3e21/e3e213b0e7173e14fc1dd3194161313087f8a3fa" alt="Kodak Pixpro S-1 front Kodak Pixpro S-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8079/f8079e7e62404f7aa04408153c07ce853fa40b12" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front"
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
- Released June 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Kodak S-1 versus Leica M-E Typ 220, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Leica. The image resolution of the S-1 (16MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) is relatively similar but the S-1 (Four Thirds) and M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The S-1 was introduced 22 months later than the M-E Typ 220 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the S-1 scores against the M-E Typ 220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro S-1 & Leica M-E Typ 220. The whole galleries are available at Kodak S-1 Gallery & Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak S-1 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
S-1 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2014 | ![]() | September 2012 | Fresher by 22 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Kodak S-1
M-E Typ 220 | S-1 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak S-1 and Leica M-E Typ 220
S-1 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Kodak S-1 features exterior measurements of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") and a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Leica M-E Typ 220 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Kodak S-1 versus Leica M-E Typ 220 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the S-1 against the M-E Typ 220.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19cb4/19cb47fd7990d5c2530b915c8328149f6fb0509c" alt="Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 size comparison Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S-1 and M-E Typ 220 is 88 and 79 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ce9e/1ce9e5ee443a715fdcf822998672379903aba710" alt="Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 top view buttons comparison Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S-1 and M-E Typ 220.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S-1 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent S-1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1f01/f1f0144007665afd61f4542826952da7dc6c7eac" alt="Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 sensor size comparison Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 sensor size comparison"
Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bda0/1bda076a6842dafabbcd1a69725449616cc83234" alt="Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Kodak S-1 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Leica M-E Typ 220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Leica |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Leica M-E Typ 220 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-06-24 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4640 x 3480 | 5212 x 3472 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 2500 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Leica M |
Available lenses | 107 | 59 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 290g (0.64 pounds) | 585g (1.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 787 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LB-070 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $250 | $0 |