Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-PL1
88 Imaging
52 Features
61 Overall
55
86 Imaging
46 Features
43 Overall
44
Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
- Released June 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL1s
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Kodak S-1 and Olympus E-PL1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the S-1 (16MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S-1 was unveiled 4 years later than the E-PL1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the S-1 scores vs the E-PL1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Pixpro S-1 and Olympus PEN E-PL1. The full galleries are available at Kodak S-1 Gallery and Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak S-1 over the Olympus E-PL1
| S-1 | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2014 | May 2010 | Fresher by 50 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Kodak S-1
| E-PL1 | S-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak S-1 and Olympus E-PL1
| S-1 | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak S-1 comes with outer dimensions of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") along with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1 has dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Check the Kodak S-1 and Olympus E-PL1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the S-1 against the E-PL1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S-1 and E-PL1 is 88 and 86 respectively.
Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The graphic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S-1 and E-PL1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Kodak S-1 to show extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher S-1 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak S-1 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
| Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2014-06-24 | 2010-05-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Truepic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4640 x 3480 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 290g (0.64 pounds) | 334g (0.74 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 54 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 487 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 410 shots | 290 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LB-070 | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $288 |