Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp
88 Imaging
53 Features
61 Overall
56
![Kodak Pixpro S-1 front Kodak Pixpro S-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1/Kodak-S-1-front.jpg)
![Sigma fp front Sigma fp front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sigma-fp/Sigma-fp-front.jpg)
84 Imaging
76 Features
79 Overall
77
Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
- Introduced June 2014
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced July 2019
- Refreshed by Sigma fp L
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Kodak S-1 versus Sigma fp, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Kodak and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the S-1 (16MP) and fp (25MP) and the S-1 (Four Thirds) and fp (Full frame) posses different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The S-1 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the fp and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the S-1 matches up vs the fp when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro S-1 & Sigma fp. The full galleries are available at Kodak S-1 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak S-1 over the Sigma fp
S-1 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Kodak S-1
fp | S-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2019 | ![]() | June 2014 | Fresher by 61 months |
Display size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+1180k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak S-1 and Sigma fp
S-1 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak S-1 comes with external dimensions of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") along with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Sigma fp has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check the Kodak S-1 versus Sigma fp in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the S-1 versus the fp.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp size comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sigma-fp-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S-1 and fp is 88 and 84 respectively.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sigma-fp-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S-1 and fp.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S-1 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma fp will resolve greater detail having an extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older S-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sigma-fp-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sigma-fp-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Sigma |
Model | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Sigma fp |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-06-24 | 2019-07-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4640 x 3480 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Total lenses | 107 | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 2,100k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 290 gr (0.64 lb) | 422 gr (0.93 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LB-070 | BP-51 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $250 | $2,050 |