Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-7
88 Imaging
52 Features
61 Overall
55
84 Imaging
62 Features
71 Overall
65
Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 400g - 120 x 67 x 43mm
- Released December 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Pixpro S-1 vs. Sony Alpha NEX-7: A Hands-On Mirrorless Showdown for the Budget-Conscious and the Enthusiast
In today’s crowded mirrorless camera market, picking the right camera often feels like trying to find a needle in a haystack - especially when budget constraints and feature demands pull you in different directions. I’ve spent countless hours testing gear to bring you straight talk on which camera to choose, not just the spec sheet fluff. In this article, we dive deep into two very different players from the mirrorless entry-level to advanced spectrum: the Kodak Pixpro S-1 and the Sony Alpha NEX-7.
These cameras launched a few years back but still merit attention for photographers prioritizing key features on a budget or those hunting for a capable backup or travel body. I’ll share first-hand impressions, technical analyses, and practical insights for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and more - plus reveal which gems you should consider for the money.
First Impressions: Design and Ergonomics Upfront
Picking up any camera, the feel in hand is the gateway to long, happy shooting sessions - or quick relief when you realize it won’t get out of the way fast enough.

Here you see the Kodak S-1 and Sony NEX-7 side-by-side. The Kodak S-1 is a featherweight at 290g, with a compact 116x68x36mm body that fits neatly in even small hands or jacket pockets - ideal for street shooters or travel fans. It sports a classic rangefinder-inspired shape with a clean top plate but surprisingly lacks an electronic viewfinder, which might irk some.
The Sony NEX-7, meanwhile, tips the scales at 400g and measures a bit larger at 120x67x43mm. This advanced mirrorless packs more heft and a chunkier grip, which I personally appreciate during longer shoots or when using heavier lenses. It also features a sturdy build and, importantly, boasts an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 0.73x magnification and full coverage, boosting compositional confidence in tricky light.
If control layout is your cup of tea, check this out:

Sony’s intuitive dial system and dedicated buttons give it a clear edge in tactile control, very important for those who want instant access without digging through menus. Kodak’s simpler layout spells entry-level usability but might frustrate users who crave quick adjustments.
Ergonomics Verdict:
If you’re a minimalist with pockets to save and casual shooting in mind, Kodak's compact body shines. But for hands-on control, comfort during extended use, and that all-important EVF, Sony’s NEX-7 wins hands down.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Engine Behind Your Shots
Now that we’ve felt the body, let’s pop the hood and look at the image sensors, arguably the most critical component determining image output quality.

Here’s where differences start to matter significantly:
- Kodak Pixpro S-1: Features a 16MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor measuring 17.3x13mm, with a native ISO range of 200-12800. The sensor area is approximately 225mm².
- Sony NEX-7: Packs a larger 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor sized 23.5x15.6mm, native ISO 100-16000, with roughly 367mm² sensor area.
Why does this size difference matter? Larger sensors gather more light, translate to better dynamic range, less noise in low light, and generally richer image detail - critical for landscape and portrait enthusiasts alike.
Sony’s roughly 1.6x larger sensor area provides tangible advantages in maintaining image fidelity, especially in challenging lighting. Moreover, the NEX-7’s sensor resolution of 24MP versus Kodak’s 16MP means sharper detail at base ISO.
From my lab testing and real-world shoots, the Sony delivers markedly cleaner images when pushing ISO beyond 1600 with less chroma noise, while the Kodak starts showing grain and detail softening sooner. The Kodak’s lower base ISO of 200 is somewhat limiting - it’s less flexible than the Sony’s wider 100-16000 ISO spread.
Image Quality Insights:
Despite Kodak’s promise of a Four Thirds sensor, image quality voices are unanimous: the Sony NEX-7 outperforms the S-1 in dynamic range and noise control, valuable for landscapes and low-light portraits.
Display and Viewfinder: Seeing in the Moment
An often overlooked but essential usability aspect is how a camera presents information and framing - screen tech and viewfinders matter enormously in varied shooting scenarios.

Both offer a 3-inch tilting LCD screen with very similar resolutions (Kodak’s 920k dots vs. Sony’s 921k), suitable for waist-level shooting or tricky angles. Neither is a touchscreen, which might feel dated to some but improves durability.
However, the Sony NEX-7’s electronic viewfinder is a game-changer in bright conditions or when precise framing is crucial. The Kodak’s lack of an EVF forces reliance on the LCD, often challenging in daylight.
Sony’s menu system feels better polished with more direct access and configurable buttons, while Kodak’s menus, though logically structured, lack depth or customization.
Display & Viewfinder Conclusion:
For outdoor use or fast-paced action, Sony’s EVF is an essential asset. Kodak users will need extra sunscreen or a shade hood for LCD-heavy shooting.
Autofocus Performance: Catching the Moment
Autofocus really makes or breaks the experience, especially for wildlife, sports, and event shooters.
Both cameras use contrast-detection autofocus, which is typical for their eras but has pros and cons.
-
Kodak S-1: 25 focus points with face detection but no phase detection or advanced tracking. Offers AF single, continuous, and tracking modes, but struggles with moving subjects - expect some hunting in dynamic scenes.
-
Sony NEX-7: Also 25 points with face detection, but superior AF selectivity and liveview AF improves performance. Unfortunately, continuous AF tracking is less robust; the camera lacks phase detection but feels snappier and more reliable in semi-static shots.
In burst mode, Sony can shoot up to 10 fps, while Kodak stops at 5 fps - meaning faster action sequences favor the Sony.
In real-world tests photographing local soccer matches and city traffic, the Sony delivered more keepers thanks to faster acquisition and steadier focus lock. Kodak’s AF lag meant missing some critical shots.
Autofocus Summary:
Sony NEX-7 offers better AF speed and burst capabilities, catering well to sports and wildlife shooters on a budget, while Kodak's slower autofocus pushes it towards casual portraits or landscapes.
Lens Ecosystem: A Lens Can Make or Break Your System
Both cameras come from mounts with thriving lens options, but they differ in variety and future-proofing.
-
Kodak S-1: Micro Four Thirds mount with over 100 lenses available from Panasonic, Olympus, and third parties. This mount balances compact lenses with a versatile zoom and primes ecosystem. The crop factor here is 2.1x, meaning a 25mm lens behaves roughly like a 52mm on full frame.
-
Sony NEX-7: Sony E-mount with over 120 lenses, including native and adapted options (thanks to an active community and third-party adapters). APS-C crop of 1.5x makes lenses slightly wider angle than MFT counterparts. Sony offers several high-quality primes and zooms catering to professional and enthusiast levels.
Given the Sony’s older launch, lens choice may require some hunting but offers more professional glass and better options for specialty lenses (macro, tilt-shift, ultra-fast primes).
Kodak’s lineup is excellent for starters wanting affordability and general use - great for travel and street photography. The compactness of MFT lenses extends system portability.
Lens Ecosystem Tip:
If you prioritize system growth with premium glass or need specialized lenses, Sony’s E-mount leads. For cost-efficient versatility and lighter kits, Kodak’s MFT mount is a solid bet.
Image Stabilization and Video Capabilities: Beyond Stills
For handheld shooting and movie enthusiasts, stabilization and video features weigh heavily.
The Kodak S-1 features sensor-based image stabilization (IBIS), which I found surprisingly effective for its class - delivering smoother handheld photos and video, especially in low light or macro scenarios where shake is amplified.
The Sony NEX-7 lacks sensor or body stabilization and relies on lens-based stabilization where available, limiting overall effectiveness for video or non-tripod shooting.
Regarding video:
-
Kodak supports 1080p Full HD at 30fps, plus 720p and slow-motion at 120fps in VGA resolution. Handy for beginners looking for simple video without bells and whistles.
-
Sony NEX-7 offers 1080p at 60fps (interlaced), 24fps, and even 1440x1080 recording, with MPEG-4 and AVCHD formats. It also includes a microphone input, a boon for those serious about audio.
Sony’s video quality and audio integration outperform Kodak’s more basic offering, making it a more versatile hybrid shooter for vloggers or casual filmmakers.
Stabilization & Video Summary:
Kodak’s IBIS aids shaky hands but video features are entry-level. Sony lacks IBIS but has better video specs and audio options for serious multimedia users.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Day and Night
Reliable battery life and storage flexibility can make or break a shoot, especially when traveling.
-
Kodak S-1 offers a respectable 410 shots per charge, powered by the LB-070 battery pack, and stores images on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards via a single card slot. No USB or HDMI ports for tethering or quick file transfer, which feels limiting.
-
Sony NEX-7 bumps this slightly with 430 shots per charge, using the NPFW50 battery, and broad storage support including Memory Stick Pro Duo alongside SD cards. It has USB 2.0 and HDMI output for fast transfers and live view on bigger screens.
In practice, both cameras are similar in endurance, though Sony’s spare battery market is larger, and more connection options make it a better choice for long days on location.
Durability and Weather Resistance: Can They Take a Beating?
Neither camera offers any weather sealing, dustproofing, or rugged body features. Both are best treated with care and avoided during heavy rain or dusty environments. For those demanding professional ruggedness, neither camera fits the bill.
Real-World Performance in Photography Genres: Where Do They Shine?
Let’s break down genre-specific strengths and weaknesses based on my shoot tests:
Portrait Photography
-
Sony NEX-7: With its superior sensor size and resolution, the Sony renders skin tones more naturally and produces creamy bokeh thanks to larger sensor reach. Eye detection AF and manual focus aid precise portraits.
-
Kodak S-1: Adequate for casual portraits; IBIS helps keep images sharp handheld. However, limited AF sophistication means less confident focusing on eyes.
Landscape Photography
-
Sony NEX-7: Higher dynamic range and resolution allow for breathtaking landscapes with detail retention in shadows and highlights.
-
Kodak S-1: Lower resolution and dynamic range lead to flatter detail and less post-processing flexibility.
Wildlife Photography
-
Sony NEX-7: Faster burst (10fps) and better AF performance help capture fleeting wildlife moments with more keepers.
-
Kodak S-1: Autofocus lags and slow burst (5fps) make it a harder sell for fast-moving subjects.
Sports Photography
Again, Sony’s speed and controls give it the upper hand, especially for amateurs stepping into sports photography on a budget.
Street Photography
Here, the Kodak’s small size and light weight come into play - a discreet setup less likely to draw attention and easy to carry all day.
Macro Photography
Kodak’s IBIS provides an edge in handheld macro shots, where any tiny shake ruins the shot, but Sony’s higher resolution compensates somewhat.
Night and Astro Photography
The Sony’s better high-ISO performance and lower noise make it the obvious choice for dimly lit or astrophotography scenarios.
Video Work
Sony NEX-7’s broader video options, higher frame rates, and microphone input win for casual filmmakers.
Travel Photography
Kodak’s lightness and compactness score well here, but Sony’s image quality brings richer travel stories to life.
Professional Workflows
Sony shots offer better RAW files, richer metadata, and wider software support. Kodak’s files are decent but less flexible for professional workflows.
Scoring the Overall Performance
Let’s peek at the numbers from expert-reviewed scoring systems alongside field notes:
As expected, Sony NEX-7 ranks higher overall thanks to its sensor, AF speed, controls, and video features. Kodak S-1 offers solid value but is confined to entry-level usage.
More detailed genre breakdown shows:
Price and Value: What Are You Really Getting?
On the pricing front, the Kodak S-1 sells for roughly $250, making it attractive for budget shoppers or as a second body. It’s a no-frills, lightweight camera that gets the job done for casual use, beginner portraits, and travel snapshots.
The Sony NEX-7, priced near $700, demands a heftier investment but delivers more advanced features, superior image quality, faster shooting, and better video - all essential for enthusiasts and advanced hobbyists looking to get serious without jumping to full-frame.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Suits You Best?
This Kodak vs. Sony comparison boils down to your photography priorities, budget, and style:
| Use Case | Recommended Camera | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Casual travel & street | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Lightweight, compact, very affordable |
| Beginner portraits and landscapes | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | IBIS helps, simple controls, decent results |
| Advanced portraits, landscapes, wildlife | Sony Alpha NEX-7 | Larger sensor, better AF, better image quality |
| Sports & action | Sony Alpha NEX-7 | Burst speed, faster AF |
| Videography & multimedia | Sony Alpha NEX-7 | HD video, mic input, HDMI port |
| Macro photography | Kodak S-1 (IBIS) or Sony NEX-7 (resolution) | Depends on ISC emphasis |
| Professional workflow | Sony Alpha NEX-7 | RAW support, better dynamic range |
In a Nutshell
- Kodak Pixpro S-1 is a neat, budget-friendly entry-level mirrorless that punches above its weight for casual photographers and travelers seeking ease and portability.
- Sony Alpha NEX-7 is an enduring advanced enthusiast mirrorless with a larger sensor, superior image quality, rich manual controls, and multimedia capabilities that justify the price premium.
If you’re a cheapskate clubbing for thumbs-worthy photos on the cheap, Kodak fills a niche well. But for enthusiasts who want to harness leather-gloved control, punchy colors, and future expandability - Sony’s NEX-7 remains a smart bet and a reliable workhorse, especially if you score it secondhand.
I hope this breakdown helps you slice through the clutter with transparency and practical wisdom. If you want me to weigh in on specific niche comparisons or lens pairings, just shout - I’m here to help!
Happy shooting!
Images used:




Kodak S-1 vs Sony NEX-7 Specifications
| Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Sony Alpha NEX-7 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2014-06-24 | 2011-12-13 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4640 x 3480 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 290 grams (0.64 pounds) | 400 grams (0.88 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") | 120 x 67 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 81 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1016 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 410 images | 430 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LB-070 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 or 5 images)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $250 | $699 |