Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10
88 Imaging
53 Features
61 Overall
56
![Kodak Pixpro S-1 front Kodak Pixpro S-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1/Kodak-S-1-front.jpg)
![Sony ZV-E10 front Sony ZV-E10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-ZV-E10/Sony-ZV-E10-front.jpg)
86 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
- Introduced June 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 1920 video
- Sony E Mount
- 343g - 115 x 64 x 45mm
- Released July 2021
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Kodak S-1 versus Sony ZV-E10, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the S-1 (16MP) and ZV-E10 (24MP) and the S-1 (Four Thirds) and ZV-E10 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The S-1 was revealed 8 years before the ZV-E10 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the S-1 scores against the ZV-E10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro S-1 and Sony ZV-E10. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak S-1 Gallery and Sony ZV-E10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak S-1 over the Sony ZV-E10
S-1 | ZV-E10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-E10 over the Kodak S-1
ZV-E10 | S-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2021 | ![]() | June 2014 | More modern by 86 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak S-1 and Sony ZV-E10
S-1 | ZV-E10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | The same display resolution |
Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak S-1 comes with exterior measurements of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") with a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Sony ZV-E10 has specifications of 115mm x 64mm x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") and a weight of 343 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Kodak S-1 versus Sony ZV-E10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the S-1 versus the ZV-E10.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 size comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sony-ZV-E10-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S-1 and ZV-E10 is 88 and 86 respectively.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 top view buttons comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sony-ZV-E10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S-1 and ZV-E10.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The S-1 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony ZV-E10 will give you more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S-1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
![Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 sensor size comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sony-ZV-E10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-S-1-vs-Sony-ZV-E10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak S-1 vs Sony ZV-E10 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Sony ZV-E10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak Pixpro S-1 | Sony ZV-E10 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-06-24 | 2021-07-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4640 x 3480 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 32000 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 150 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 3840 x 1920 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 1920 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x1920 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 290g (0.64 lb) | 343g (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") | 115 x 64 x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photographs | 440 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LB-070 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $250 | $699 |