Leica C vs Olympus 550WP
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Leica C vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Introduced September 2013
- Additionally referred to as Typ112
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 550WP
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica C vs Olympus 550WP Overview
Here is a complete review of the Leica C vs Olympus 550WP, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the C (12MP) and the 550WP (10MP) is fairly well matched but the C (1/1.7") and 550WP (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C was revealed 4 years later than the 550WP and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the C scores against the 550WP with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica C vs Olympus 550WP Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica C & Olympus Stylus 550WP. The full galleries are viewable at Leica C Gallery & Olympus 550WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Olympus 550WP
| C | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2013 | January 2009 | Fresher by 57 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Leica C
| 550WP | C |
|---|
Common features in the Leica C and Olympus 550WP
| C | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Leica C vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica C has physical dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus 550WP has dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Leica C vs Olympus 550WP in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the C compared to the 550WP.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the C and 550WP is 92 and 94 respectively.
Leica C vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The visual below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the C and 550WP.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The C having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica C will give you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher C should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica C vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica C vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
| Leica C | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica C | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
| Otherwise known as | Typ112 | mju 550WP |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-09-08 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $1,299 | $399 |