Leica C vs Olympus 6000
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d949/2d949ce59b7b15ca64b36096df2d53ace9d9ebd9" alt="Leica C front Leica C front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9387/c9387039ab5c223fcc36ca8de7fbd3b8f5516027" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Revealed September 2013
- Alternative Name is Typ112
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Leica C vs Olympus 6000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the C (12MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is very similar but the C (1/1.7") and 6000 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The C was announced 4 years later than the 6000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the C scores versus the 6000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica C and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The whole galleries are provided at Leica C Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Olympus 6000
C | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 51 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Leica C
6000 | C |
---|
Common features in the Leica C and Olympus 6000
C | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Leica C offers outside dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has specifications of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Leica C vs Olympus 6000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the C against the 6000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85fb3/85fb3fe9e14aebd6a0a53a0e074b0e304b6ff77d" alt="Leica C vs Olympus 6000 size comparison Leica C vs Olympus 6000 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the C and 6000 is 92 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48a3c/48a3c19f515d3ec85bae7fa5584bdd27ee65bab8" alt="Leica C vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison Leica C vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison"
Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the C and 6000.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The C with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica C will deliver greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher C should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa375/aa375d8079ddae9de367957d85a0d5b574900a17" alt="Leica C vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison Leica C vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison"
Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6def0/6def07fb821b29b9bce4bede1513de3691d35e54" alt="Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Leica C vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Leica C | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica C | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Also Known as | Typ112 | mju Tough 6000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-09-08 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lb) | 179 grams (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $1,299 | $259 |