Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d949/2d949ce59b7b15ca64b36096df2d53ace9d9ebd9" alt="Leica C front Leica C front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Released September 2013
- Additionally Known as Typ112
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Leica C versus Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the C (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is very comparable but the C (1/1.7") and XZ-10 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The C was brought out 8 months later than the XZ-10 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the C matches up against the XZ-10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica C & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The entire galleries are available at Leica C Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Olympus XZ-10
C | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Leica C
XZ-10 | C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica C and Olympus XZ-10
C | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica C comes with outside dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has sizing of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica C versus Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the C versus the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/738be/738be71592ad37fc1c0d78f1b39c24814d474dc4" alt="Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the C and XZ-10 is 92 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5efd1/5efd1c4a1b90988e9410338303881ff7ba994859" alt="Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C and XZ-10.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor sizing. The C features the larger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh simpler. The younger C will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cbf4/4cbf47b5f34732a97f226e600eec628e1ec74ce0" alt="Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc2b7/fc2b762ee8408aedfb48a9544486c0778afaccf4" alt="Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Leica C vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Leica C | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica C | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Also called as | Typ112 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-09-08 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | 240 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $1,299 | $428 |