Leica C vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Leica C vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Launched September 2013
- Additionally referred to as Typ112
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Leica C vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Leica C vs Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the C (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very similar but the C (1/1.7") and TG-320 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe C was released 21 months after the TG-320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the C scores versus the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica C vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica C & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Leica C Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Olympus TG-320
| C | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 21 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Leica C
| TG-320 | C |
|---|
Common features in the Leica C and Olympus TG-320
| C | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Leica C vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Leica C enjoys outer dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Leica C vs Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the C vs the TG-320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Leica C vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the C and TG-320.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer C should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica C vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica C vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Leica C | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica C | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also Known as | Typ112 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-09-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | 150 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $1,299 | $0 |