Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Launched September 2013
- Also referred to as Typ112
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the C (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the C (1/1.7") and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C was announced 17 months after the TG-1 iHS which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the C grades versus the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica C & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Leica C Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| C | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2013 | May 2012 | More modern by 17 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 610k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Leica C
| TG-1 iHS | C |
|---|
Common features in the Leica C and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| C | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Leica C has outside dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the C against the TG-1 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C and TG-1 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the C and TG-1 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The C features the bigger sensor which will make obtaining bokeh less difficult. The newer C is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Leica C vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Leica C | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica C | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Also referred to as | Typ112 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-09-08 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,299 | $399 |