Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
36 Features
59 Overall
45
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Launched September 2013
- Also Known as Typ112
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Leica and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the C (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the C (1/1.7") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C was launched 12 months before the WG-M1 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the C grades against the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica C and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Leica C Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Ricoh WG-M1
| C | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Leica C
| WG-M1 | C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | September 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Leica C and Ricoh WG-M1
| C | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and volume. The Leica C features external measurements of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the C compared to the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through technical specs. The pic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the C and WG-M1.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The C featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged C is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Leica C vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Leica C | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Ricoh |
| Model type | Leica C | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also called as | Typ112 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-09-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 350 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,299 | $2,000 |