Clicky

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3

Portability
82
Imaging
69
Features
58
Overall
64
Leica CL front
 
Olympus PEN E-P3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
48
Features
60
Overall
52

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs

Leica CL
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 50000
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 403g - 131 x 78 x 45mm
  • Released November 2017
Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
  • Released August 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-P2
  • Successor is Olympus E-P5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the CL (24MP) and E-P3 (12MP) and the CL (APS-C) and E-P3 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The CL was revealed 6 years after the E-P3 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the CL scores against the E-P3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica CL over the Olympus E-P3

 CL E-P3 
ReleasedNovember 2017August 2011Newer by 77 months
Display resolution1040k614kClearer display (+426k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Leica CL

 E-P3 CL 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus

Common features in the Leica CL and Olympus E-P3

 CL E-P3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Leica CL enjoys outside dimensions of 131mm x 78mm x 45mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P3 has specifications of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).

Analyze the Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the CL versus the E-P3.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CL and E-P3 is 82 and 86 respectively.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 top view buttons comparison

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the CL and E-P3.

All in all, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The CL with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica CL will give you extra detail because of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern CL should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 sensor size comparison

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica CL Portrait photography information
Olympus E-P3 Portrait photography information
73
decent MP (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
lack of manual focus
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica CL
Street photography with Olympus E-P3
73
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
good ISO range (50,000)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
76
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
includes touch to focus
fixed screen
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Leica CL Sports photography advice
Olympus E-P3 Sports photography advice
63
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/25,000 seconds)
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
no image stabilization
not so great battery life (220 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
49
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Leica CL Travel photography information
Olympus E-P3 Travel photography information
66
comes with focus via touch
decent MP (24 megapixels)
not so great battery life (220 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
60
includes touch to focus
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Leica CL Landscape photography features
Olympus E-P3 Landscape photography features
69
swap lenses (Leica L mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good ISO range (50,000)
delivers RAW formats
lack of manual focus
no image stabilization
not so great battery life (220 shots)
65
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Leica CL Vlogging info
Olympus E-P3 Vlogging info
33
touchscreen functionality
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of external mic jack
35
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Leica CL vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica CL and Olympus E-P3
 Leica CLOlympus PEN E-P3
General Information
Brand Leica Olympus
Model type Leica CL Olympus PEN E-P3
Class Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2017-11-21 2011-08-17
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Maestro II TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 6014 x 4014 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 50000 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 49 35
Lens
Lens support Leica L Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 30 107
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 1,040k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/25000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m (@ ISO 200)
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 403 gr (0.89 lb) 369 gr (0.81 lb)
Dimensions 131 x 78 x 45mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 1.8") 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 51
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 536
Other
Battery life 220 images 330 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-DC12 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $3,799 $0