Leica CL vs Olympus E-PL9
82 Imaging
68 Features
58 Overall
64
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Leica CL vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 50000
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 403g - 131 x 78 x 45mm
- Revealed November 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Leica CL vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Leica CL versus Olympus E-PL9, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the CL (24MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the CL (APS-C) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CL was brought out 2 months before the E-PL9 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the CL grades vs the E-PL9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica CL vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica CL and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The entire galleries are available at Leica CL Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica CL over the Olympus E-PL9
| CL | E-PL9 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Leica CL
| E-PL9 | CL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica CL and Olympus E-PL9
| CL | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2017 |  | February 2018 | Same generation |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1040k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Leica CL vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica CL enjoys outside dimensions of 131mm x 78mm x 45mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 1.8") along with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL9 has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Look at the Leica CL versus Olympus E-PL9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the CL and the E-PL9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the CL and E-PL9 is 82 and 85 respectively.
Leica CL vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the CL and E-PL9.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CL because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica CL will produce extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively.
Leica CL vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Leica CL vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
| Leica CL | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica CL | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2017-11-21 | 2018-02-08 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Maestro II | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 6014 x 4014 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 50000 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 30 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/25000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 8.6 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 403 grams (0.89 lbs) | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 78 x 45mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 1.8") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 350 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-DC12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $3,799 | $599 |