Clicky

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2

Portability
82
Imaging
69
Features
58
Overall
64
Leica CL front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs

Leica CL
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 50000
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 403g - 131 x 78 x 45mm
  • Introduced November 2017
Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched May 2013
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
Photography Glossary

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Leica CL versus Olympus E-PM2, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the CL (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the CL (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The CL was introduced 4 years later than the E-PM2 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the CL scores versus the E-PM2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica CL over the Olympus E-PM2

 CL E-PM2 
LaunchedNovember 2017May 2013More recent by 55 months
Screen resolution1040k460kClearer screen (+580k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica CL

 E-PM2 CL 
Manual focus More exact focus

Common features in the Leica CL and Olympus E-PM2

 CL E-PM2 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica CL offers exterior measurements of 131mm x 78mm x 45mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 1.8") and a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Analyze the Leica CL versus Olympus E-PM2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the CL compared to the E-PM2.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the CL and E-PM2 is 82 and 89 respectively.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CL and E-PM2.

As you have seen, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CL using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica CL will produce more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern CL is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica CL Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography advice
73
good MP (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detect focus
supports RAW formats
focusing manually not possible
71
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
delivers RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica CL
Street photography with Olympus E-PM2
73
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
provides touch focus
very good high ISO (50,000)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
79
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
has focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Sports Comparison

Leica CL Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-PM2 Sports photography highlights
63
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/25,000 seconds)
good MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
lack of image stabilization
low battery pack (220 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
does not have phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Leica CL as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Travel photography camera
66
provides touch focus
good MP (24MP)
low battery pack (220 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
66
has focus via touch
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not contain selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Leica CL as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Landscape photography camera
69
switch lenses (Leica L mount)
nice screen size (3")
good MP (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
very good high ISO (50,000)
supports RAW formats
focusing manually not possible
lack of image stabilization
low battery pack (220 CIPA)
74
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Leica CL as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PM2 as a Vlogging camera
33
has touchscreen
has face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have mic port
36
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of mic port
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Leica CL vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica CL and Olympus E-PM2
 Leica CLOlympus PEN E-PM2
General Information
Brand Leica Olympus
Model Leica CL Olympus PEN E-PM2
Class Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2017-11-21 2013-05-21
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Maestro II -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 6014 x 4014 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 50000 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 49 35
Lens
Lens mount Leica L Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 30 107
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/25000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 403g (0.89 pounds) 269g (0.59 pounds)
Physical dimensions 131 x 78 x 45mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 1.8") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 72
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.2
DXO Low light score not tested 932
Other
Battery life 220 images 360 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BP-DC12 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at release $3,799 $448