Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
88 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0248/e02487e47752159256491a15e661025f0e8ec740" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 front Leica D-LUX 5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Released September 2010
- Successor is Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Leica D-LUX 5 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the D-LUX 5 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the D-LUX 5 (1/1.63") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The D-LUX 5 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the D-LUX 5 matches up against the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica D-LUX 5 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-LUX 5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
D-LUX 5 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Leica D-LUX 5
XZ-2 iHS | D-LUX 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | September 2010 | More modern by 27 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica D-LUX 5 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
D-LUX 5 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Leica D-LUX 5 offers external measurements of 110mm x 66mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Leica D-LUX 5 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the D-LUX 5 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79f1e/79f1e765cb325e1666124172f77cb15261b65542" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the D-LUX 5 and XZ-2 iHS is 88 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b19c3/b19c371bacb3e3b02613afb96f53de3863cf7cbf" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the D-LUX 5 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The D-LUX 5 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will provide more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged D-LUX 5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6043a/6043a773a7f3a09d2b05328ef22456e83ad5096f" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6831/c6831876f8b8944eed91e80f80bbcc43eb30deb8" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Leica D-LUX 5 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica D-LUX 5 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-09-21 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $799 | $450 |