Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W
88 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Announced September 2010
- Replacement is Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Leica and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the D-LUX 5 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly close but the D-LUX 5 (1/1.63") and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe D-LUX 5 was brought out 4 months later than the HZ35W so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the D-LUX 5 grades vs the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica D-LUX 5 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are provided at Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-LUX 5 over the Samsung HZ35W
| D-LUX 5 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Leica D-LUX 5
| HZ35W | D-LUX 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Leica D-LUX 5 and Samsung HZ35W
| D-LUX 5 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica D-LUX 5 comes with external measurements of 110mm x 66mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the D-LUX 5 versus the HZ35W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D-LUX 5 and HZ35W is 88 and 91 respectively.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The visual here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the D-LUX 5 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The D-LUX 5 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung HZ35W will provide you with more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Leica D-LUX 5 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Samsung |
| Model | Leica D-LUX 5 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $799 | $300 |