Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F
88 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0248/e02487e47752159256491a15e661025f0e8ec740" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 front Leica D-LUX 5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Launched September 2010
- Later Model is Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Leica and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the D-LUX 5 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the D-LUX 5 (1/1.63") and WB35F (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The D-LUX 5 was released 4 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the D-LUX 5 matches up versus the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica D-LUX 5 and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are available at Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-LUX 5 over the Samsung WB35F
D-LUX 5 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Leica D-LUX 5
WB35F | D-LUX 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | September 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
Common features in the Leica D-LUX 5 and Samsung WB35F
D-LUX 5 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica D-LUX 5 features exterior dimensions of 110mm x 66mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the D-LUX 5 against the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a7fd/1a7fde6fdc3b64f2afc21891c1a5bddd2787d144" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the D-LUX 5 and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8683c/8683c83fe888b57bc9d25285237d37c00655c3c9" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the D-LUX 5 and WB35F.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The D-LUX 5 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB35F will give more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged D-LUX 5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b43b/4b43b2a520bc26781ee58b489e4e4decde826389" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a061/5a0616b05b9c829d67f15f9218682350eb576f38" alt="Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Leica D-LUX 5 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Samsung |
Model | Leica D-LUX 5 | Samsung WB35F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-09-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $799 | $130 |