Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Panasonic ZS200
82 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Also referred to as Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Panasonic ZS200, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Leica and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the D-Lux Typ 109 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") enjoy different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe D-Lux Typ 109 was announced 4 years earlier than the ZS200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the D-Lux Typ 109 matches up vs the ZS200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Panasonic ZS200
D-Lux Typ 109 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
ZS200 | D-Lux Typ 109 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | September 2014 | More modern by 41 months | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 921k | Crisper screen (+319k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Panasonic ZS200
D-Lux Typ 109 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 offers physical dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") with a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Panasonic ZS200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 vs the ZS200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the D-Lux Typ 109 and ZS200 is 82 and 86 respectively.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the D-Lux Typ 109 and ZS200.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The D-Lux Typ 109 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will result in greater detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged D-Lux Typ 109 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Panasonic |
Model | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called as | Typ 109 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-09-23 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dot | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 405g (0.89 lbs) | 340g (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 370 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,095 | $800 |