Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
82 Imaging
50 Features
70 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e26f7/e26f7fcbfa221c71ce0a7d3d48169be090d65ce4" alt="Leica D-Lux Typ 109 front Leica D-Lux Typ 109 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04d9/f04d99e0c26c31be60485c208bc04019fbc69c93" alt="Sigma DP2 Merrill front Sigma DP2 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Other Name is Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Newer Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by companies Leica and Sigma. The resolution of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the D-Lux Typ 109 (Four Thirds) and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The D-Lux Typ 109 was released 2 years after the DP2 Merrill which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the D-Lux Typ 109 grades against the DP2 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
D-Lux Typ 109 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 32 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
DP2 Merrill | D-Lux Typ 109 |
---|
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
D-Lux Typ 109 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 provides external measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 and the DP2 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22ab6/22ab6db2dadfc82f42ede6cc41461cd146a733f4" alt="Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the D-Lux Typ 109 and DP2 Merrill is 82 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0698/a0698a31b2e30dc9be527c14e71f04574917bb65" alt="Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the D-Lux Typ 109 and DP2 Merrill.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The D-Lux Typ 109 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will show extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern D-Lux Typ 109 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9d69/e9d6913964ee331794e0812e78e6145e457f47ee" alt="Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db455/db455877ae42004bf0273c6c9876a2ba7bc4600d" alt="Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Sigma |
Model | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Alternate name | Typ 109 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-09-23 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 405 grams (0.89 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,095 | $931 |