Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
82 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Launched September 2014
- Additionally Known as Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by companies Leica and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the D-Lux Typ 109 (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe D-Lux Typ 109 was announced 8 months after the DP2 Quattro and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the D-Lux Typ 109 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
D-Lux Typ 109 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | February 2014 | Newer by 8 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
DP2 Quattro | D-Lux Typ 109 |
---|
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
D-Lux Typ 109 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 offers outside dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") with a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 vs the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the D-Lux Typ 109 and DP2 Quattro is 82 and 70 respectively.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the D-Lux Typ 109 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can see, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The D-Lux Typ 109 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render greater detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher D-Lux Typ 109 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Sigma |
Model type | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Otherwise known as | Typ 109 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-09-23 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | 45mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 405 gr (0.89 lbs) | 395 gr (0.87 lbs) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $1,095 | $931 |