Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX1R II
82 Imaging
50 Features
70 Overall
58
78 Imaging
76 Features
65 Overall
71
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Alternative Name is Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Revealed October 2015
- Previous Model is Sony RX1R
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX1R II Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sony RX1R II, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Leica and Sony. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the D-Lux Typ 109 (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) come with different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe D-Lux Typ 109 was brought out 12 months prior to the RX1R II which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the D-Lux Typ 109 matches up vs the RX1R II for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The entire galleries are provided at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery and Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Sony RX1R II
D-Lux Typ 109 | RX1R II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
RX1R II | D-Lux Typ 109 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2015 | September 2014 | Newer by 12 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 921k | Sharper display (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sony RX1R II
D-Lux Typ 109 | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 comes with external dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") having a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") and a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Examine the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sony RX1R II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 compared to the RX1R II.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the D-Lux Typ 109 and RX1R II is 82 and 78 respectively.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The pic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the D-Lux Typ 109 and RX1R II.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The D-Lux Typ 109 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will give you more detail having its extra 29 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged D-Lux Typ 109 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Sony |
Model | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Also Known as | Typ 109 | - |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-09-23 | 2015-10-13 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | 35mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 14cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 405g (0.89 pounds) | 507g (1.12 pounds) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 97 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 220 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $1,095 | $3,300 |