Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
![Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Leica-M-E-Typ-220/Leica-M-E-Typ-220-front.jpg)
![Leica M Typ 262 front Leica M Typ 262 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Leica-M-Typ-262/Leica-M-Typ-262-front.jpg)
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched November 2015
- Alternate Name is Typ 262
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Leica M Typ 262, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras and both are manufactured by Leica. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and M Typ 262 (24MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (Full frame).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The M-E Typ 220 was unveiled 4 years prior to the M Typ 262 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the M-E Typ 220 grades vs the M Typ 262 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Leica M Typ 262. The full galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Leica M Typ 262 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Leica M Typ 262
M-E Typ 220 | M Typ 262 |
---|
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
M Typ 262 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2015 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 38 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262
M-E Typ 220 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 features exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Leica M Typ 262 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Leica M Typ 262 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the M Typ 262.
![Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Leica-M-E-Typ-220-vs-Leica-M-Typ-262-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and M Typ 262 is 79 and 77 respectively.
![Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 top view buttons comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Leica-M-E-Typ-220-vs-Leica-M-Typ-262-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and M Typ 262.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Leica M Typ 262 to give extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M-E Typ 220 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
![Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 sensor size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Leica-M-E-Typ-220-vs-Leica-M-Typ-262-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and ViewFinder
![Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Leica-M-E-Typ-220-vs-Leica-M-Typ-262-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica M Typ 262 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Leica |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica M Typ 262 |
Also referred to as | - | Typ 262 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2015-11-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Maestro |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5952 x 3976 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Leica M |
Number of lenses | 59 | 59 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585g (1.29 lb) | 600g (1.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-SCL2 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $5,069 |