Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
76 Imaging
83 Features
56 Overall
72
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 60MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 64 - 50000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 640g - 139 x 80 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2022
- Replaced the Leica M10
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras and both of them are sold by Leica. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and M11 (60MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (Full frame).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M-E Typ 220 was manufactured 10 years earlier than the M11 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the M11 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Leica M11. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Leica M11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Leica M11
| M-E Typ 220 | M11 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Leica M11 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
| M11 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2022 |  | September 2012 | Fresher by 113 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3.00" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 2333k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+2103k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M11
| M-E Typ 220 | M11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 enjoys outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Leica M11 has proportions of 139mm x 80mm x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 640 grams (1.41 lbs).
See the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the M11.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and M11 is 79 and 76 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and M11.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Leica M11 to deliver more detail due to its extra 42MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M11 Specifications
| Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica M11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Leica |
| Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica M11 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2022-01-13 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 60 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 9528 x 6328 |
| Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 50000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Leica M |
| Total lenses | 59 | 62 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 2,333k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 3600 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 4.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | Yes |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 585 gr (1.29 lb) | 640 gr (1.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 139 x 80 x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 69 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 787 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 700 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BC-SCL7 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12s) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card | UHS II type SD |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $8,995 |