Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701
79 Imaging
64 Features
28 Overall
49
85 Imaging
57 Features
56 Overall
56
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced April 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are sold by Leica. The image resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the T Type 701 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and T Type 701 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe M-E Typ 220 was brought out 19 months earlier than the T Type 701 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M-E Typ 220 scores against the T Type 701 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Leica T Typ 701. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Leica T Type 701 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Leica T Type 701
| M-E Typ 220 | T Type 701 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
| T Type 701 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2014 | September 2012 | Fresher by 19 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 1300k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1070k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701
| M-E Typ 220 | T Type 701 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Leica T Type 701 has measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Examine the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M-E Typ 220 vs the T Type 701.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and T Type 701 is 79 and 85 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and T Type 701.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will produce greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications
| Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica T Typ 701 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Leica |
| Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica T Typ 701 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2014-04-24 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4944 x 3278 |
| Highest native ISO | 2500 | 12500 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Leica L |
| Number of lenses | 59 | 4 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,300 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lb) | 384 grams (0.85 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 69 | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | 787 | 1082 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BP-DC13 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $1,603 |