Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Leica T Typ 701 front
Portability
85
Imaging
59
Features
56
Overall
57

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Leica T Type 701
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12500
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
  • Introduced April 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are sold by Leica. The image resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the T Type 701 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and T Type 701 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M-E Typ 220 was brought out 19 months earlier than the T Type 701 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M-E Typ 220 scores against the T Type 701 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Leica T Type 701

 M-E Typ 220 T Type 701 

Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 T Type 701 M-E Typ 220 
IntroducedApril 2014September 2012Fresher by 19 months
Screen dimensions3.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution1300k230kSharper screen (+1070k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701

 M-E Typ 220 T Type 701 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Leica T Type 701 has measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).

Examine the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M-E Typ 220 vs the T Type 701.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T  Type 701 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and T Type 701 is 79 and 85 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T  Type 701 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and T Type 701.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will produce greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T  Type 701 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T  Type 701 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography factors
Leica T Type 701 Portrait photography factors
71
you can focus manually
MP count good (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
75
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography factors
Leica T Type 701 Street photography factors
65
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
70
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
comes with touch focus
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Sports photography highlights
Leica T Type 701 Sports photography highlights
46
MP count good (18 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
54
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Travel photography with Leica T Type 701
57
MP count good (18 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
69
comes with touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography features
Leica T Type 701 Landscape photography features
61
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
MP count good (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse function
69
manual focus
change lenses (Leica L mount)
lovely big screen (3.7")
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging info
Leica T Type 701 Vlogging info
9
lack of video recording
32
touchscreen capability
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of external microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701
 Leica M-E Typ 220Leica T Typ 701
General Information
Brand Name Leica Leica
Model type Leica M-E Typ 220 Leica T Typ 701
Type Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-09-17 2014-04-24
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2
Peak resolution 5212 x 3472 4944 x 3278
Highest native ISO 2500 12500
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount type Leica M Leica L
Number of lenses 59 4
Focal length multiplier 1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3.7 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,300 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.7x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.50 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 grams (1.29 lb) 384 grams (0.85 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 69 75
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 23.0
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 12.7
DXO Low light rating 787 1082
Other
Battery life - 400 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BP-DC13
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots One One
Cost at release $0 $1,603