Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701
79 Imaging
64 Features
28 Overall
49
85 Imaging
57 Features
56 Overall
56
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced April 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are sold by Leica. The image resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the T Type 701 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and T Type 701 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M-E Typ 220 was brought out 19 months earlier than the T Type 701 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M-E Typ 220 scores against the T Type 701 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Leica T Typ 701. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Leica T Type 701 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Leica T Type 701
| M-E Typ 220 | T Type 701 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
| T Type 701 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2014 | September 2012 | Fresher by 19 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 1300k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1070k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701
| M-E Typ 220 | T Type 701 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Leica T Type 701 has measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Examine the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica T Type 701 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M-E Typ 220 vs the T Type 701.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and T Type 701 is 79 and 85 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and T Type 701.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will produce greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications
| Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica T Typ 701 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Leica |
| Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica T Typ 701 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2014-04-24 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4944 x 3278 |
| Highest native ISO | 2500 | 12500 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Leica L |
| Number of lenses | 59 | 4 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,300 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lb) | 384 grams (0.85 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 69 | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | 787 | 1082 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BP-DC13 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $1,603 |