Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 III
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Launched February 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by companies Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the E-M1 III (20MP) is fairly comparable but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M-E Typ 220 was launched 8 years earlier than the E-M1 III and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up vs the E-M1 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-M1 III
M-E Typ 220 | E-M1 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-M1 III | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | September 2012 | More recent by 90 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-M1 III
M-E Typ 220 | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus E-M1 III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the E-M1 III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and E-M1 III is 79 and 67 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and E-M1 III.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2020-02-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic IX |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) | 580 grams (1.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Launch price | $0 | $1,800 |