Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8079/f8079e7e62404f7aa04408153c07ce853fa40b12" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 front Leica M-E Typ 220 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Replacement is Olympus E-P2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The M-E Typ 220 was launched 3 years after the E-P1 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the M-E Typ 220 grades versus the E-P1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus PEN E-P1. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Olympus E-P1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-P1
M-E Typ 220 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 39 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-P1 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P1
M-E Typ 220 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-P1 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-P1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a9fd/2a9fd97992580cf92778a777af1b7c9266c1b87d" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and E-P1 is 79 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e242/7e242a53d84225b0cfb02898d53c78e6a708d1ea" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 top view buttons comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and E-P1.
All in all, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer M-E Typ 220 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d888/7d8882743a2644b119fb094ce4861dc219b0916e" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 sensor size comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 sensor size comparison"
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/179b0/179b0ca1639db442ff5950bc02b2713d6016f1cf" alt="Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-P1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-P1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2009-07-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 lbs) | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 69 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $0 | $182 |