Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Launched September 2012
Olympus E-P1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P2
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M-E Typ 220 was launched 3 years after the E-P1 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the M-E Typ 220 grades versus the E-P1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-P1

 M-E Typ 220 E-P1 
IntroducedSeptember 2012July 2009More modern by 39 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-P1 M-E Typ 220 
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P1

 M-E Typ 220 E-P1 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-P1 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-P1.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and E-P1 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M-E Typ 220 and E-P1.

All in all, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer M-E Typ 220 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-P1 Portrait photography highlights
71
you can focus manually
good megapixels (18MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Street photography with Olympus E-P1
65
big sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-P1 as a Sports photography camera
46
good megapixels (18MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
no liveview
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery power (300 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography features
Olympus E-P1 Travel photography features
57
good megapixels (18MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not offer selfie friendly display
43
missing Timelapse recording
terrible battery power (300 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography info
Olympus E-P1 Landscape photography info
61
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
good megapixels (18 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
60
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
terrible battery power (300 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-P1 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focusing
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P1
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-P1
General Information
Manufacturer Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-P1
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2012-09-17 2009-07-29
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5212 x 3472 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 2500 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) None
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 gr (1.29 lbs) 355 gr (0.78 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 69 55
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 10.4
DXO Low light rating 787 536
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC card
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $0 $182