Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
79
Imaging
64
Features
28
Overall
49
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
46
Features
42
Overall
44

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus E-P1
  • New Model is Olympus E-P3
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Below is a complete overview of the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M-E Typ 220 was introduced 2 years later than the E-P2 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the E-P2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-P2

 M-E Typ 220 E-P2 
ReleasedSeptember 2012April 2010More recent by 30 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-P2 M-E Typ 220 
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P2

 M-E Typ 220 E-P2 
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check out the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the M-E Typ 220 compared to the E-P2.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-P2 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The graphic underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M-E Typ 220 and E-P2.

All in all, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will give greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger M-E Typ 220 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography details
70
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no liveview
59
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography details
Olympus E-P2 Street photography details
65
big sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
46
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
39
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery life (300 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography details
Olympus E-P2 Travel photography details
57
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
43
missing Timelapse recording
not so great battery life (300 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography details
61
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.5")
no liveview
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
60
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery life (300 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focus
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-P2
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-P2
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-09-17 2010-04-22
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 5212 x 3472 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 2500 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 grams (1.29 lbs) 355 grams (0.78 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 69 56
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 10.4
DXO Low light rating 787 505
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC card
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $0 $799