Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2012
Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched May 2010
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-PL1s
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview

Below is a in depth assessment of the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL1, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The M-E Typ 220 was released 2 years later than the E-PL1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the E-PL1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL1

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL1 
LaunchedSeptember 2012May 2010More recent by 29 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-PL1 M-E Typ 220 
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL1

 M-E Typ 220 E-PL1 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has got physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Compare the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-PL1.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL1 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL1.

As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher M-E Typ 220 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-PL1 Portrait photography details
71
you can focus manually
MP count good (18 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL1 as a Street photography camera
65
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-PL1 as a Sports photography camera
46
MP count good (18 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
no liveview
slow frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
low battery (290 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-PL1 Travel photography factors
57
MP count good (18 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly display
51
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
low battery (290 shots)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PL1 as a Landscape photography camera
61
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
MP count good (18MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse function
55
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
low battery (290 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging features
Olympus E-PL1 Vlogging features
9
no video recording
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL1
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus PEN E-PL1
General Information
Make Leica Olympus
Model Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus PEN E-PL1
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-09-17 2010-05-17
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Truepic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5212 x 3472 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 2500 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 585 gr (1.29 pounds) 334 gr (0.74 pounds)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 69 54
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score 11.7 10.1
DXO Low light score 787 487
Other
Battery life - 290 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC card
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $0 $288