Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50


86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL1s

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL1, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.

The M-E Typ 220 was released 2 years later than the E-PL1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up versus the E-PL1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus PEN E-PL1. The complete galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-PL1
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | ![]() | May 2010 | More recent by 29 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
E-PL1 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL1
M-E Typ 220 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has got physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Compare the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-PL1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the M-E Typ 220 and the E-PL1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL1 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and E-PL1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher M-E Typ 220 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2010-05-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 pounds) | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 69 | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 787 | 487 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $0 | $288 |